|
Under the Indo-US
Knowledge Initiative on Agriculture Education, Research,
Services and Commercial Linkages, a joint Board has been
constituted. The Board has identified priority focus
areas namely:
q
Education,
Learning Resources, Curriculum Development and Training,
q
Food
Processing, Use of Byproducts and Bio-fuels
q
Biotechnology
q
Water
Management
A detailed Work Plan has also been drawn
up.
The third meeting of the Board is
scheduled in the second week of June in Washington, USA.
Wide consultations are being held by the Indian Council of
Agricultural research with different stakeholders in this
regard. As part of the process, ICAR organized an
interface last week in New Delhi with the private sector
in which industry associations, industry representatives
including important individual players participated. The
Deputy Chairman, Planning Commission, Dr. Montek Singh
Ahluwalia chaired this important interaction. Dr.
Ahluwalia emphasized the need for Indian industry to be
far more involved in this Knowledge Initiative and called
on the participants to identify the thrust and priorities
which should be brought upfront in the Board’s
deliberations in relation to research, human resource
development and commercial linkages.
The industry
representative observed that the Initiative is welcome,
timely and has many positive features. However, the
features of Indian farming have to be kept in view while
designing the activities under the Initiative. The Indian
market also has to be kept in view and value addition
through processing and packaging should receive much
attention. There should be more linkage of ICAR with
Industry. The suggestion of the industry to have an
internal advisory committee of about 10 to 12 members
representing private sector and other stakeholders to
provide feed back and advise for Indo-US Knowledge
Initiative was appreciated. There was suggestion on the
need for food safety regulation and implementation,
protecting the IPRs etc. It was clarified that IPR
portfolio management would essentially be as per the
stipulations and provisions of National Law as per Indian
Patents Act and Plant Varieties Protection and Farmers’
Rights Act. Obviously, this would be on mutually agreed
terms. On genetic resources, it emerged clearly that
there is no exchange of germplasm as envisaged in the Work
Plan. Moreover multilateral system is already in place.
It emerged that far more stronger partnership between
public and private institutions would highly be rewarding
in commercialization of a number of technologies.
For enhancing
productivity, profitability and well-being of the Indian
farmers, it was felt that far greater emphasis could be
laid on processing, product development, and value
addition. It emerged that biotechnology would play
pivotal role and transgenics could be highly rewarded on
which much needed far more awareness be brought in the
public so that the benefit could be appreciated on a
changing time scale. The industry also suggested
technical backstopping from research system on SPS
compliance.
*********************
|